Let me preface this post by saying that as a practicing Catholic, I absolutely 100% believe that the devil is real, that he is the avowed enemy of Jesus Christ and His Followers, and that demonic possession is just as real.
I also believe that most Hollywood movies about the devil and demonic possession are way over the top and that their main purpose is just to scare people. Movies are not a place anyone should go to learn about the reality of Satan and the role he plays in the world.
Now on to my review of the movie, "Nefarious."
In April of 2023, a movie entitled "Nefarious" was released. It is a completely fictional story purporting to be about demonic possession. The poster for the movie would indicate it is to be considered a horror film.
The plot: a possessed serial killer, Edward Wayne Brady, has been sentenced to death. The psychiatrist examining him declared him to be insane and therefore ineligible for the death penalty. However, the psychiatrist committed suicide and therefore, a new psychiatrist was brought in to re-examine the condemned man to judge his sanity.
The new psychiatrist, Dr. James Martin, comes to the prison to perform the examination mere hours before Brady is scheduled to be executed. Martin is given a few short hours to determine if the condemned man should live or die. At one point, Brady threatens to end the session, and Martin says that would be unfortunate because he would have to make his determination on limited information.
That is our first clue that this story is completely unrealistic. Are we really supposed to believe the State would execute a man just based on a hunch that the man is sane, but they're not sure? Please.
When Martin sits down with Brady, there is immediate confrontation between the two men. This would not seem to be the way a real psychiatrist would interact with someone to determine his sanity. Psychiatrists do not make judgments as people speak. They just let them speak. How else can they determine the mental state of a person?
As the conversation begins, we find out that Martin knows very little about Brady. Nor does he try to actually learn anything at all about Brady. There is never any real conversation about Brady's past, about any abuse he may have suffered as a child or adult, no talk about any drug addiction, etc. Martin says he read the files from the previous doctor, yet he seems completely ignorant of everything about Brady. Clue number 2 that this story has no connection with reality.
But it turns out that Brady knows all about Martin. Brady knows Martin is a young man in his 30's and graduated from prestigious schools with honors. Brady also knows that Martin is an atheist, completely rejecting God and anything spiritual. Seems kind of weird that the patient being examined knows more about the doctor that than the doctor knows about the patient, don't you think?
A few minutes into the "examination", the demon reveals to Martin that Brady is actually a victim of demonic possession. The demon not only freely shows himself, he gives Martin his name, Nefarious, and his whole history. Martin acts surprised, even though he says he read the files on Brady, and Martin later reveals that the files said exactly this.
This was clue number 3 that this movie has no connection to reality. Anyone who has ever heard talks by exorcists knows that demons would never willingly expose themselves and say, "I'm a demon." And demons would absolutely NEVER want to reveal their names because knowing their names gives the exorcist power over them. In fact, even the demon in this movie says that names are important and they have power. Father Vincent Lampert, an exorcist in Indiana, says that when a demon names himself, he is submitting to the power and authority of God and demonstrating weakness.
Nefarious then goes on to explain demons and how they work. Really? A demon is going to voluntarily educate a human being on the tricks of the trade? This movie just gets more and more ridiculous.
However, Nefarious does give some correct information when he says that demons don't just possess someone all at once, that it is a series of "yeses". Here is the scene.
There are demonic assaults that, although they do not block the person’s intellectual powers and free will, succeed in inserting thoughts or obsessive images into the mind (the imagination and the memory) that the victim is not able to expel. In these cases, the person feels tormented by a fixed idea that he knows is foreign to him and seeks to find a way to reject it. But it is so deeply imprinted in his mind and spirit that it seems to be really his.
Nefarious states that the next "stage" is infestation. Infestation has nothing to do with the devil possessing people. It is all about possessing things or even animals. Like obsession, any priest is allowed to pray over such an affliction.
From Father Carlin:
The extraordinary action of the Devil that causes disturbances and nuisances in places, houses, and objects is called diabolical infestation in a locality. It also includes diabolical action on animals, which, in the last analysis is directed at man. The manifestations of such action are unexplainable noises, apparitions of objects or changes of their location, music or odd noises, phosphorescence (emission of light without any perceptible heat), odors, lights, animals that react as if they have seen someone or that are in an excited state, shadows, silhouettes, faces, and so forth.
Diabolical vexations that appear as physical attacks on a person are cuts, burns, scratches, punctures, writing on the skin, bites, beatings, blows that leave bruises, swellings, bloody sores, broken bones, incisions on the skin that spell words or form signs that persist for a certain time and then disappear, and illnesses with unknown causes and unknown cures. Obstacles also occur in the workplace and among affective relationships without logical explanation.
And finally, actually possession. Only a priest who has received permission from his bishop can perform an exorcism. Exorcists say that demonic possession is actually very rare. Father Vince Lampert says it is one in 5,000 cases that he sees.
From Father Carlin:
Possession is not a splitting of the personality. Rather, it involves a temporary displacement of the person, during which a brutal and violent demonic spirit takes control. Acting from within the body, the demon makes the helpless victim speak and act as he wishes: such a phenomenon can be defined as the moment of crisis.
The Devil dominates the body of the person in order to annul his faculties of self-determination and control. The presence of the demon in the human body neutralizes the person’s ability to direct himself, so that he becomes a blind, docile instrument that is fatally obedient to a perverse and despotic power.
Nefarious then tells Martin that he pushed the previous doctor to commit suicide because he wanted Martin. The reason? He wants Martin to publish his story. This is another clue that this movie has no connection to reality. Demons never want notoriety or publicity. They don't even want people to believe they exist. It is achingly clear that no exorcist was consulted in the making of this movie.
Martin then calls a chaplain into the room. At first the demon is threatened by the chaplain and backs away, but the chaplain reveals that he does not believe in demons and this puts Nefarious at ease. In real life, the demon would have known this immediately when the chaplain walked into the room. The demon would have known the chaplain had no authority over him and would never have backed down to him in any way. The demon would just laugh at him and mock him.
It is also at this point that Martin reveals he is an atheist. For anyone who knows anything about the devil, this movie has become completely unbelievable. The devil would never bother with an atheist. Why? Because he already owns that person. The devil would not want to do anything that might make the atheist start to question his rejection of God. And yet, as we shall see, Nefarious actually tries to convince Martin that not only is there is a God, but that God loves human beings. No demon would ever willing testify to this. It is, in effect, preaching the Gospel.
Next, Nefarious tells Martin to "invite him in." Again, a complete disconnection with reality for all the reasons just stated. A demon would never waste his time possessing an atheist because the atheist is already doing the devil's bidding and is on his way to hell unless he repents. The story line of this movie is completely implausible.
However, Martin agrees to being possessed with the caveat that he gets to make a request as well. Nefarious does not possess him.
Nefarious then begins to taunt Martin about the events of his life, starting with the death of Martin's mother. Nefarious reveals that Martin's mother died by assisted suicide, assisted by Martin himself. Martin feels no guilt about this, does not seem haunted by it in any way. This is just the way the real devil would want him to feel because it completely disconnects him from God.
Yet, Nefarious is trying to induce guilt and shame, which could very well drive Martin to God. No self-respecting demon would ever engage in such activity. Demons only point out guilt when a person already feels guilty, in an attempt to drive them to complete despair. There was no need for this in Martin's case.
After this, Nefarious says "Ready for round 2?" Martin replies "I didn't know this was a fight." Nefarious: "That's why you're losing."
Huh? Martin was an atheist. He was already lost. The devil, at that point, had already won. Nefarious seems to be trying to change Martin from an atheist into a believer. This movie just gets more and more ridiculous, as we see in the next scene.
Nefarious tells Martin that God exists. Gives Martin a lesson in theology and how demons came to be. Here is the scene.
All kinds of animals, birds, reptiles and sea creatures are being tamed and have been tamed by mankind, but no human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison.
With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse human beings, who have been made in God’s likeness. Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this should not be. (James 3:7-10)
I haven't seen this movie, but you're absolutely right that right wing Christians love it. The fact that right-wing Christians decry Hollywood movies with leftist propaganda but eagerly eat up movies with right-wing propaganda is astounding.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.ncregister.com/commentaries/the-theology-of-evil-and-eternity-nefarious-screwtape-and-world-wars
ReplyDeleteThis is a review of this crappy movie from a Catholic columnist who lives in London. Not only am I astounded by the fact that he missed the actual message of the film (he's definitely a right wing Catholic), but he also wrote a column criticizing James Bond and laid out the negative impact it has had on the world. Yes, I'm a Bond fan, but since I'm a woman and a devout Catholic, I have never strived or desired to live the way Bond does. And my reaction to both columns was (in my mind), "Sir, take care of the splinter in your own eye instead of focusing on how Bond has impacted our world for the worse." In his 007 column, he told many truths and several lies about James Bond.
I will note that the threats that 007 poses are not subtle. They're right in your face.
Thanks for the link. NCR, of course, is part of EWTN, so I would expect no less from them. I think it is almost heresy to compare Nefarious to The Screwtape Letters. I have read the latter, and it is magnificent, not pushing any political agendas as Nefarious does, but showing how the devil actually works.
DeleteThe reviewer of Nefarious talks as if we are in a brand new war that the world has never seen before. Screwtape Letters talks about that same war, and it was published over 80 years ago. And a couple of thousand years ago, St. Paul wrote, "Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms." (Eph 6:11-12)
I also find it interesting that none of these right wing reviewers ever get upset about the fact that the devil wins in this movie. I have never heard of an exorcism movie where the devil wins except this one, and yet the right wing all love it. BTW, Fr. Amorth, the most famous exorcist of our time, said the original Exorcist movie of 1973 was his favorite. He said tho it went over the top in some ways, it was the most realistic.
You're welcome! I have also read The Screwtape Letters and I agree it is magnificent. I agree that it's interesting that the Devil winning in this movie doesn't upset these right wing reviewers one bit.
DeleteI'm not a fan of exorcism movies.
And even though we are in a spiritual war, I personally like what Christian artist Makoto Fujimura has invented: culture care. His idea is that we should treat our culture like a garden to be tended and cultivated, not a territory to be won in battle.
DeleteAnd Eduard Hapsburg--Lothringen, the Hungarian ambassador to the Holy See and a devout Catholic, is a 007 fan, too.
ReplyDeleteI'm a fan of Ignatian spirituality, so I try to see God in everything.
ReplyDeleteOne thing that astounds me with these right wing Catholics, besides many of them supporting and contributing to ETWN is articles like this: https://www.thescottsmithblog.com/2018/02/the-hidden-evil-of-starbucks-logo.html And if that isn't a enough: an episode of the podcast is called The Mischief of Loki and Motu Inproprio. I'm more concerned about the Motu Inproprio title than the discussion of Season 1 of the Loki TV Show.
ReplyDeleteBut goodness gracious some of the comments on the link I sent you were bad.
ReplyDelete