Wednesday, August 29, 2018

My Unabashed Support for Pope Francis


Pope Francis is under siege now in a way we have never seen any papacy attacked in modern times. The enemies of Pope Francis want him out of the papacy and they will go to almost any lengths to do it. They use every kind of invective possible against him. They accuse him of being the devil himself.

One of John Zuhlsdorf's readers asked Zuhlsdorf if it was okay to pray for the pope's death. You would think a good priest would say that we need to pray that the pope be guided by the Holy Spirit and protected from all evil forces, given the courage and ability to fulfill the duties of his office.

Nope. Zuhlsdorf did not have the least problem with praying for the death of the pope. 

And now these enemies of Pope Francis feel they have finally gotten the weapon they need to blow Pope Francis out of the water.  That weapon, of course, is Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano.  

Some news sources are reporting a coup in the Church.  I think the word "coup" is a very good description of these events.  

Which side is the Holy Spirit on?  Is the Holy Spirit the inspiration for those who attack and smear Pope Francis?  Does the Holy Spirit inspire division and hate?  


I am unabashed in my support of Pope Francis.  I think he is one of the most holy men to ever sit in the Chair of Peter.  We have been very blessed with good and holy popes for the past 150 years or more.  Pope Francis ranks up there with the best of them.  


I see Pope Francis as a holy man of God who has given his entire life in service to the Church. Unlike many in his position, his greatest joy is being around the weak and poor.  I will always think of him in Washington, DC, turning down a luncheon with the high and mighty in the US Congress and instead spending his time in a soup kitchen among the homeless. We have never seen any high ranking prelate, and certainly never a Pope, choosing the poor over the powerful, at least not in our lifetime.

.A girl hugs Pope Francis as he visits with people at St. Maria's Meals Program of Catholic Charities in Washington Sept. 24. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
Everything about Pope Francis shouts "authentic!"  Never have we had any prelate or pope identify himself to the world as a "sinner."  Never have we seen a pope kneel down at the confessional as an example for all the world.


Never have we seen a pope kneeling down and not just washing the feet of poor refugees, but kissing their feet and treating them with the utmost dignity and respect in ways they may have never experienced before.



And we know that these kind of actions didn't just begin when he was elected Pope.  AOL.com reported that:
"Bergoglio passed up the opportunity as Argentina's archbishop to live in the grand Archbishop's Palace in Buenos Aires -- the official residence. Instead, he chose to live in a "small room" in a downtown Buenos Aires apartment building, where he commuted by bus to the Metropolitan Cathedral. In this humble space, Cardinal Bergoglio even did his own cooking -- and the place was only heated by a small stove, said USA Today."
He rode the subway with the public, always making himself available to anyone who wished to speak with him. He regularly visited the poor in their neighborhoods.

As a cardinal, Jorge Mario Bergoglio made it a habit to preach in Buenos Aires' Constitución square. He also formed a close bond with Paraguayans and Bolivians in the Buenos Aires slums.
Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio kissing Cristian Marcelo Reynoso’s foot during a Masswith youth trying to overcome drug addiction in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 2008.
Cardinal Bogoglio in Buenos Aires.
Argentine Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio takes the Line A of the underground prior to the celebration of the traditional Tedeum mass at the Metropolitan Cathedral on May 25, 2008 in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
We have been hearing so much about priests and bishops who put themselves above the people, living their own lives, seeking after pleasure and comfort.  But Jorge Bergoglio has always lived his life for others.  Back in the 70's and 80's he put his life at risk getting people out of Argentina when they were being hunted down by the military, as the New York Post reported in an article entitled, "Pope Francis saved many from Argentina’s death squads."


Pope Francis loves Our Lady.  He dedicated his papacy to her from the beginning.  He says, despite his busy schedule, he manages to pray three rosaries every day.  He also spends an hour in adoration every day.  Can we say that?  

He is not in the best of health. He has only one lung, and other health problems.  He never allows that to stop him.  He has received assassination threats when he has traveled.  He has never allowed that to stop him from going into the crowds and meeting the people.  He must give ulcers to his security detail.  


Pope Francis loves people.  He invites the poor and homeless into the Vatican to have lunch with him. He makes personal phone calls and counsels people over the phone.  

He lives in a small apartment outside the papal apartments where he is much more accessible to people.  He never turns anyone away.  There is the very famous picture of Pope Francis hugging a very deformed man, not in the least put off by his appearance.  


And yet no Pope in recent history has ever been as reviled, mocked and hated by those who call themselves Catholic as Pope Francis has experienced.  I reported the vile words used by Michael Voris accusing Pope Francis of conspiring with evil.  Read these awful accusations and see if they have any connection to the man I just described:
You have treated too many of the faithful with coldness and callousness, abusing the power of your office in regard to their sufferings over this horrendous unconscionable evil which you have facilitated.
. . .
Your hypocritical and shameless parade of empty words of sorrow and pleading for forgiveness are an egregious affront to those who believe in God, because you lack all sincerity.
How many trips are you going to take, paid for by the faithful, where you continue to meet with victims, supposedly mourn with them and then return to Rome and conspire with those who abused them or created the environment for the abuse — or both?
Your actions and omissions have left you unable to reign over the Church in any meaningful way. You have no credibility, no moral authority, not a shred of decency left after having covered up one scandal after another, until the day you go to your own grave.
You had better hope that this is not the state you die in, or you will be delivered over to the demons for an everlasting death of agony and torment in the unquenchable fire, for popes are not immune from risk of damnation, whether you believe in Hell or not.
Voris has the gall to accuse Pope Francis of not believing in hell, when no pope has ever preached more about the danger of going to hell.  Voris is a disgrace to his religion.  He is the one who should be worrying about eternity.


Pope Francis has been given a very heavy cross.  He is the spiritual leader of many who despise him and would literally like to see him dead.  He is human, and he has said he does have trouble dealing with the hatred directed towards him.  But I have no doubt that this only drives him more to his knees.  

Our Lord told us that by their fruits we will know them.  When I look at Pope Francis, I see a humble, holy man who loves God and loves His people.  I see a man who will literally sacrifice his life to serve God.

Pray for the Pope.



24 comments:

  1. There's something about this April 2018 conference entitled, “Catholic Church: Where are you heading?" in which Vigano and Tosatti were in attendance.

    https://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCAKBN1JN27K-OCATP

    "“The anger directed at Francis by many conservatives is often cloaked in concerns over doctrine and orthodoxy, but much of it is a simple and understandable frustration over not having the inside track any more as they did in the previous two papacies,” said David Gibson, director of the Center on Religion and Culture at Fordham University in New York."

    It's like they have moved to the next phase. They tried using doctrine as a cloak (consequently impeding or undermining its sound development) and now they're using the abuse scandals as a cloak (consequently impeding or undermining the reforms that have been underway and which still have an uphill battle). In using doctrine they have taught error, and in using the abuse scandals they have fomented lies (where truth must be established). They have no problem treading Emeritus Benedict underfoot as well.

    They have moved to the next phase.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The cloak of doctrine phase concentrated into the dubia that demanded an answer that was damned if you do and damned if you don't. With Vigano's distortions: damned if you do and damned if you don't.

    I find it kind of amusing the people who say that all what Pope Francis has to do is give an answer and it will clear this all up. LOL. That's not remotely how it would work. They are setting up pretexts. The Pharisees presented Jesus with questions under the hypocrisy of being faithful teachers and guides, when they were just trying to ensnare him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I so agree with you, It really is a replay of the Pharisees trying to trick Jesus. The Pharisees absolutely were not looking for answers. They were looking for ways to take Jesus down. The same is true for those going after Pope Francis. I was very glad he never answered the Dubia. And he should never answer the Viganò memo, either. I am praying that the Holy Spirit will bring out the truth.

      Delete
  3. I have communicated privately via e-mail with Catholic Answers apologist Tim Staples. He has told me the following:

    "I do not think Pope Francis should resign even if he is guilty. If he does, this will send a very bad message that if you get enough people to protest you can turn the Church into a democracy. Those would be very dangerous waters."

    By the way, Catholic in Brooklyn, hold your nose and go to the following URL:

    https://youtu.be/r2Wr9DS8mTU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Christopher. That is a very wise comment from Staples. I wish he would say that publicly, From what I read,, Pope Francis has no intention of stepping down. He is a very strong man, and much more importantly, he has great faith. I have no doubt he sees this suffering as reparation for the sins of the clergy.

      All Voris needs is horns. Pope Francis enemies are now saying that Mueller was dismissed because he followed the rules in the abuse cases and Francis didn’t like that. Do you notice that these stories always come from anonymous sources in the Vatican? Yet when Mueller was dismissed, they were saying it was because he disagreed with Francis on the divorce and remarriage issue.

      These people are led by the demonic.

      Delete
    2. To be honest, Catholic in Brooklyn, I screwed up in quoting a private email that Tim Staples sent to me. Mr. Staples was not happy about that, and I have already apologized to him.

      Delete
    3. Once you have an email, it is your property to do with as you wish. Staples knows that, If he didn’t want that known, he should not have sent it to you. You did not screw up, and you should have not apologized to him.

      I have no respect for Staples. He does not have the courage to say what he really believes. Instead, he plays the game of the people who syndicate his show. And who is that? None other than EWTN, who are doing everything they can to destroy Pope Francis.

      Delete
    4. Well, Mr. Staples wasn't happy about what I did due to concerns over being quoted out of context. I actually did not quote an entire enmail from him. Mr. Staples actually said more than what I quoted from that one email.

      Delete
    5. As I wrote Christopher, once he sends you an email, it is your property to do with as you please. If he isn’t happy with that, he should have never written what he did.

      Again, I have no respect for anyone any doesn’t say what he really believes.

      Delete
    6. Catholic in Brooklyn, remember Paragraph 2477 of the "Catechism of the Catholic Church."

      http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2477.htm

      Delete
    7. And this is what it says:

      2477 Respect for the reputation of persons forbids every attitude and word likely to cause them unjust injury. He becomes guilty:
      - of rash judgment who, even tacitly, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor;

      - of detraction who, without objectively valid reason, discloses another's faults and failings to persons who did not know them;

      - of calumny who, by remarks contrary to the truth, harms the reputation of others and gives occasion for false judgments concerning them.


      Repeating an email is not making remarks contrary to the truth unless Staples lied in his email. Then it is on him.

      Seems to me that those attacking the Pope would do well to heed this passage.

      Delete
  4. Glad to hear Staples hasn’t gone insane. I’m getting tired of this political feud in my church. Zuhlsdorf should go back to being a Lutheran he is a prideful arrogant hateful man. He does not have the temperament to be a shepherds to sinners.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zuhsldorf is the face of clericalism.

      Delete
    2. Amen to that. He is a very unhappy and angry man. I've never figured out how he is able to get away with what he says and does.

      Delete
    3. Jim how angry priests who openly espouse opinions more like Ayn Rand then the holy mother church is beyond me. A priest saying such things and being so vicious to me is scandal.

      Delete
  5. God Bless you in your support of the Holy Father. It is saddening to see the press he is getting. Several years ago Voris back peddled from criticizing the Pope after many of his supporters slammed him for his words. I guess those faithful to the Pontiff have loss their voice in light of the scandal. I will continue to pray for the Pope and our Church.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really wonder if that was some sort of strategic move on the part of Voris. Now he can say that the Pope is so bad even he has to call for his resignation. Please pray for Pope Francis.

      Delete
  6. Just wondering...what happened to the Vigano "I don't believe you" post? I was going to send that to my parents (who believe that report)...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am actually updating it. Pentin has given some interviews on EWTN which have made me realize that I had misinterpreted what he has said. Trust me, I still think he is carrying water for the anti-Frances forces, but in a little different way than I thought. I have also learned a few things about the people who are behind Vigano. It is much worse than I thought.

      Hope to have the post back up soon.

      Delete
  7. Cahtolic in Brooklyn, check this out:

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2018/08/impressions-state-of-the-vigano-francis-controversy.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Christopher. It is good to see someone with an open mind. However, I have to honestly say that I don't know how anyone can think the angels could ever be on the side of those causing division and strife in the Church. More on that in my re-posting of why I don't believe Vigano.

      Delete
  8. It's a shame OSV lists both Steve Ray and Zuhlsdorf of their list of 10 catholic "musts" web sites. in their defense this was in 2012 which is maybe before they both went off the deep end. https://www.osv.com/OSVNewsweekly/ByIssue/Article/TabId/735/ArtMID/13636/ArticleID/9316/Ten-mustsee-web-resources-for-Catholics.aspx

    ReplyDelete
  9. Catholic in Brooklyn, can you possibly post a URL to a piece that DOES indicate that Father Zuhlsdorf considers it OK to pray for the pope's death?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, Christopher. I have been avoiding my own blog as well as all others for the last couple of weeks. I will explain why in an upcoming post.

      It seems that Zuhlsdorf deleted the original post, but it was discussed many times on the Internet. Here is one example, in which it is specifically quoted:

      http://www.sacerdotus.com/2018/02/father-z-not-sinful-to-pray-for-popes.html

      As I just stated, it seems that Zuhsldorf has deleted the original post, but he did a follow up post in which he quotes himself and then apologizes for being "misunderstood." Yea, right.

      http://wdtprs.com/blog/2017/02/wherein-fr-z-apologizes-and-explains-a-response-to-a-readers-question/

      I have no use for John Zuhsldorf. I think he is causing untold harm in the church through spreading division and hate. I pray for his soul because unless he repents, he is headed for a very bad end.

      Delete

Related Posts  0